An Argument for Euthanasia Essay -- Argumentative Essays, Persuasive Es

An statement for mercy killing mercy killing is defined as, The act or practice of putt to death painlessly a person execrable from an incur fitting disease. Euthanasia can be traced back as far back as the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was sometimes allowed in these civilizations to help others die. free euthanasia was approved in these ancient societies. Today, the practice of euthanasia causes majuscule controversy. Both pro-life groups and right-to-die groups premise arguments for their different sides. Pro-life groups make arguments and present fears against euthanasia. I contend that the case for the right to die is the stronger argument. I pull up stakes begin my by listing the arguments against euthanasia and my criticism of each argument. 1. Euthanasia is a violation of medical ethics. The American Medical Association has consistently condemned euthanasia as an unethical practice. Today, attitudes may be changing. Recent surveys prognosticate that a major ity of doctors in some areas, (60% in Oregon, 56% in Michigan, and 54% in Great Britain.) favor euthanasia in utmost(a) cases. 2. Euthanasia weakens the trust relationship between the doctor and the patient. We expect doctors to bring around and save lives, non to kill. I feel that I should be able to trust my doctor to do what is best for me as an individual in any situation, including ending unbearable suffering, even if it is my choice to die in order to end my suffering. Doctors may lose the trust of their patients by not helping them to end their suffering. 3. Choosing the time and place of a person?s death is God?s decision. This argument suggests that we should never intervene in any life-threatening situation. If a person is having a heart attack, should we just... ...admit that they become given heavy doses of morphine to relieve the extreme pain of terminally ill patients, knowing that such high doses will cause a quicker death. Because their old aim is to relieve p ain, these acts are considered moral. It would not be morally right to give the same high doses of morphine if their primary aim was to cause death. This is in my opinion wrong. In either case, the last-ditch end is death. I believe that it is immoral of society to force caring, sympathetic people to lie and go to such morbid lengths to help their patients and love ones end their suffering. These illegal acts would be entirely unnecessary if euthanasia were correct and legalized. Value Premise Everyone deserves to live a life free from suffering. literal Premise Euthanasia ends suffering.Conclusion In order to end suffering euthanasia should be allowed.