Sir Thomas Mores A Man For All Seasons :: Sir Thomas More Man All Seasons Essays

Sir Thomas to a greater extents A Man For totally SeasonsA Man For All Seasons was written active Sir Thomas More and his family relationship with the more powerful members of the country in thesixteenth century. It is a deflection of history, dramatised toenhance the experience. Written in the 1960s in a valet de chambre approaching out ofglobal depression, a time of peace, love and drugs, it was a backboneamongst the rose coloured glasses. When people were used to a morerelaxed establishment, with very very much more equality than the decadesleading up to it, A Man For All Seasons confronted an immoral, strictand spineless monarch that was Henry VIII. The play was a soused studyof moral integrity versus corruption and selfishness, which bothcontradicted and enforced what the world was like in the 1960s.Bolts intention was to influence the present by represent the past.A Man for All Seasons has a slow build up the first three quarters ofthe book lays the foundations of the plot in a linear fashion beforegradually advancing to a much more meaningful climax. This climax issplit into four main sections In The Tower, More Sees His Family,The Trial and The Execution. I will conk to analyse these inturn.The beginning of the end is where More is in the tower. This startswith the mesmerize of the Common Man. He speaks and there is no oneelse on the stage, and he is facing the audience. This indicates thathe is a modern device, he is a cause in the play, but he acts as akind of bank clerk to break the audiences suspension of disbelief. Thisis ironic because we know its not real, it makes us more poignant,and the audience knows things the characters dont. This is needed, asthe play is very emotional, the audience need soul to remind themthat the play isnt real, yet it is based on a dependable story, which theCommon Man reminds us of as well. Now look shows that he is funny,cheeky and much less formal. The fact that he plays small characters passim the pl ay, and none of the other characters notice alsobreaks the audience away from the seriousness of the play. This isimportant as the play is based on a trustworthy story, the audience are morelikely to get emotional about the events in the play, and need to berelieved of this tension if they are to filly appreciate, understand,and bonk the play. Better a live rat than a dead lion shows thatthe Common Man is almost the complete opposite of More, as More is